Thursday, January 18, 2007

Fight against Racism!

This is to protest against the racist remarks and discrimination against the Indian actress Shilpa Shetty and the humiliation she is facing within the Celebrity Big Brother House at the hands of the so called "fair skinned tribe".
Channel 4 have clearly edited the programme to cut out the many offences committed against Shilpa, one being Jack Tweedy calling Shilpa a 'Paki' was bleeped out but clearly with the footage available on the Internet and on the various news channels one can lip read. Yet Channel 4 bleeped it, failing to expose Jack Tweedy for the racist bigot he is.
On live footage housemate Liverpool girl Danielle and racist Jack Tweedy were telling Jade Goody that "Shilpa wants to be white" repeatedly on the 13th January 2007.
Shilpa has also been subjected to offensive comments from Jackey Budden upon initial entrance into the house Budden was immediately rude to Shilpa and obviously had a chip on her shoulder. She refused to say her two-syllable name correctly and, calling her many things along the way, referred to her on repeated occasions as "the Indian", asked her whether she lived in a house or a shack and seemed to have much disdain towards her for no apparent reason. Danielle, after many times saying Shilpa's name correctly, referred to as "whatsername Shullup" when putting her down. Viewers have expressed revulsion at the episode, which had a shouting match between Shetty and Goody. During the furious row with Shetty, Goody shouted at Shilpa to "go back to the slums... get real... you're a fake". After the row, another of Shetty's tormentors, former model and disgraced beauty queen Danielle Lloyd, laughed and said to Goody, "That was **** fantastic, I loved it, I think she should **** off home".
Channel 4 continue to sugar-coat all the offences, surely no racial discrimination is a rule in the Big Brother House, why hasn't anyone been called into the diary room about it?
The editing and favoritism is helping every racist in the United Kingdom forward their bigoted agenda. This is nothing but blatant racism on British television s, and what appears to be Channel 4's and its CBB TV presenters' denial is angering the Asian Community and many other members of the British public a great deal. Goan-origin Labour MP Keith Vaz criticised Channel 4's refusal to apologise for the racially charged events on the show and said it was a cynical marketing ploy for Duncan to urge the British public to vote with their feet to evict one of the two women.
According to reports Shetty has often been reduced to tears on being taunted about her skin colour, accent and cooking. In a recent episode she was branded a ‘dog’ by fellow housemate and former Miss Great Britain Danielle. Danielle along with former S Club Seven singer Jo imitated her accent while another evicted contestant called her ‘The Indian’ and refused to learn how to pronounce her name. Meanwhile Britain's media watchdog Ofcom has been flooded with more than 15,000 complaints against the show. So, while people continue to rant about the incident - we wonder if it’s actually for the first time that celebrities have been subjected to mockery and hostility on National television.

Channel 4 is meant to be showing a REALITY SHOW, and the irony is that they have shown REALITY as it exists in United Kingdom in this day and age

Tuesday, October 31, 2006

Justice to Priyadarshini Mattoo

October 30, 2006 15:14 ISTLast Updated: October 30, 2006 23:27 ISTRediff NewsThe Delhi high court on Monday awarded the death sentence to advocate Santosh Kumar Singh, convicted for commiting the rape and murder of Priyadarshini Mattoo, a Delhi University law student, eleven years ago.Pronouncing the judgment in a jam-packed court room, Justices R S Sodhi and P K Bhasin ordered that "he (Singh) shall be hanged till death."The court said he deserved nothing other than capital punishment.Singh was arrested in 1996 and tried, but the trial court headed by G P Thareja gave him the benefit of doubt and acquitted him of the charges."He does not deserve to be pardoned. This is rarest of the rare cases," Justice R S Sodhi and Justice P K Bhasin said in their judgment.The Delhi police had brought Singh to the court under heavy security and waited outside while the defence counsel and Central Bureau of Investigation advocates argued over the quantum of punishment.Singh's face fell when he was told that the court had given him the death sentence. He is likely to challenge the judgment in the Supreme court.Dressed in grey trousers and white shirt, Singh, a practising lawyer who is married and has a child, was crestfallen when the court handed down the verdict.Singh became emotional when his father came out of the court room and met him."There is absolutely no doubt in our mind that what was required of Singh was exemplary behaviour being a son of police officer and a lawyer himself. Yet with a pre-meditated approach, he continued to harass the victim for two years," the Bench said."Inspite of repeated warnings by the police and his undertakings to them, he went about commiting the most ghastly act. The act itself sent ripples in society and showed how insecure a citizen can get against this kind of a person," the Bench remarked.The entire proceedings were witnessed by some friends and family members of both the victim and the convict.Justice Sodhi's wife and his daughter were also among those witnessing the proceedings.Singh was acquitted by the Sessions Court in 1999, a judgment that was described as "perverse" by the high court.The Sessions Judge G P Thareja had held that though he knew that Singh had committed the murder, he was acquitting him because of lack of evidence.The order by the high court division bench on Monday came after three-hour long arguments by the defence and prosecution over the quantum of sentence."We are of the opinion that a case of this kind in which the crime is committed in a pre-meditated way and grotesque manner, the convict deserves nothing other than death penalty," the bench observed.The Delhi high court had convicted him on October 17.Singh had been stalking Priyadarshini Mattoo for nearly two years following which she had lodged a complaint at two different police stations.The Bench, after hearing the arguments by the counsels of both the parties on the quantum of sentence, observed that evaluating the circumstances in favour and against the convict, 'the aggravating circumstances far outweigh the mitigating circumstances'.Appearing for CBI, Additional Solicitor General Amrendra Sharan pressed for death sentence as the case falls under the category of 'rarest of rare cases' and said Singh raped and murdered a defenceless victim.He pointed out that Singh had stalked the victim for two years making her and her family life miserable.Sharan said the abhorrent mannner in which the murder was committed is the aggravating circumstance.Singh deserved no clemency for he had committed a pre-meditated and cold-blooded murder evident from the fact that on the fateful day he had stalked the girl for the whole day and waited outside her house for the moment when she was alone to commit the offence.Citing Apex Court Judgment in the Dhananjoy Chatterjee case, he argued the convict committed the diabolique, grotesque and gruesome offence to satisfy his brutal lust and he is a danger to the society.He ruled out any possibility of his being reformed.Sharan said the convict was a soldier of justice and greater responsibilty and respect for law of the land was expected of him.He did not reform himself despite several opportunities and warnings given to him. He had not even kept the assurances given by him to the police that he would not repeat the mischievious acts, said Sharan.B L Wali, advocate for Chaman Lal Mattoo, Priyadarshini's father, said that his client was more than happy with the death sentence."We had to slog hard for the case. When we entered the court room in the morning to argue for quantum of sentence, we were not sure what would impress the court. We are glad that the court gave him a death sentence," he said in a conversation with rediff.com on Monday evening.Friend Aditya Raj Kaul, who started a petition on the internet to gather support for the case in March this year, was delighted at the judgement."It took ten years to get justice. It is thanks to the media that we were able to gather support and thousands of people wrote back and said that we should join a campaign. That is how the campaign, Justice for Priyadarshani, started on her birthday on June 23. The rest is history - a landmark judgement in 50 days," he said.Chronology of Events:January 23, 1996: Priyadarshini Mattoo raped and killed allegedly by Santosh Kumar Singh. Delhi police registers FIR.January 25, 1996: Case handed over to the CBI. Agency registers case.April 11, 1996: CBI files chargesheet in the case against Singh.August 29, 1996: Charges framed.August 11, 1997: Trial starts.December 3, 1999: ASJ G P Thareja acquits Singh; lashes CBI for shoddy investigations.February 29, 2000: CBI appeals in Delhi high court.April 26, 2000: High court admits appeal.October 17, 2000: High court issues bailable warrant against Singh.July 22, 2006: CBI files application for early hearing.August 31, 2006: High court orders daily hearings in the case.Oct 17, 2006: High court convicts Santosh Singh for raping and killing Mattoo.Oct 30, 2006: High court gives death sentence to Singh.With PTI Inputs

HC to decide on sentence - The Final Judgement Day...This is to inform all that after the judgement convicting Santosh Kumar Singh of rape and murder of Priyadarshini Mattoo on 17th October, the final arguments and judgement announcing punishment will take place today in the afternoon at the Delhi High Court. Justice Sondhi in his Judgement had said that either Santosh will be given life imprisonment or death sentence.Lets hope that strongest and the harshest punishment is given to this criminal.Members of Justice For Priyadarshini, Bollywood personalities and senior journalists and lawyers are expected to attend this historic final judgement.

Justice For PriyadarshiniMattoo case: HC to decide on sentenceBureau ReportNew Delhi, Oct 29: Twelve days after convicting Santosh Kumar Singh for raping and murdering Priyadarshini Mattoo on January 23, 1996, the Delhi High Court will tomorrow hear arguments on the quantum of his sentence.Holding Santosh guilty of the offence on October 17, a division bench of Justices R S Sodhi and P K Bhasin fixed October 30 for hearing arguments from both sides on the quantum of sentence.Following a submission made by the CBI for stringent punishment for Santosh, the bench hinted that it would award him either capital punishment or life imprisonment for commiting the grisly murder nearly 11 years ago.Setting aside a lower court's order acquitting santosh, the bench said, "The trial court, however, quite amazingly after holding almost all crucial circumstances in favour of the prosecution, has ordered unmerited acquittal of the respondent (Santosh) by taking a perverse approach in the matter."Despite being convinced that there was no doubt in the prosecution case (at least for murder), the trial court has mauled justice, its decision has shocked the judicial conscience of this court," the bench observed.Rejecting the submission made by Santosh's counsel that the blood sample of the accused, taken for a DNA test, was tampered with by the CBI, the bench said, "We find no evidence to show that there was any tampering with the blood sample sent to the laboratory for the test. There is nothing on record to show that the seals on the sample were ever tampered with." The circumstantial evidence in the case is absolutely inconsistent and incompatible with the innocence of the respondent (Singh)," the bench remarked."From an overall analysis of the circumstances that had been discussed, we are of the view that those circumstances form a chain so complete which leads us to the only conclusion that it is Santosh Kumar Singh who had committed the rape of Mattoo and then murdered her," the bench said. (Agencies)

Hope ignites for Kataras

Neelam Katara, mother of Nitish Katara.
The reversal of the acquittal in the Priyadarshini Mattoo case is being seen as a precursor to the other two high-profile cases of miscarriage of justice: Jessica Lall and Nitish Katara.
Amid all the jubilation, the six-year delay in reversing the trial court's decision still rankled. Since the Nitish Katara case has been stalled at the trial stage because of Bharati Yadav's evasive tactics, his mother, Neelam Katara, struck a note of caution. "The end is good, but the wait had been too long. The delay needs to be looked into as it helps the accused and leads to difficulties for the victim's family." She said: "The victim family should be allowed to participate in the trial rather than being silent spectators. They should be allowed to speak up during the hearings if they want to make an important point."

Jessica’s sister witnesses conviction
Sabrina Lall, Jessica Lall's sister“We are hopeful now” said Sabrina Lall today as she witnessed the verdict being delivered in the Mattoo case. Fighting a similar battle seeking justice for her sister, Jessica Lall, she was experiencing it first hand literally.When the HC Justices RS Sodhi and PK Bhasin were reading out their judgment today, convicting Santosh Singh of raping and murdering 23-year-old Priyadarshini Mattoo, Lall’s was another family present in the courtroom.As the same two-member Bench is hearing the appeal in the Jessica Lall murder case, Sabrina and her friends were sitting in the courtroom along with accused in the case, Amardeep Singh Gill alias Tony and Alok Khanna. They keenly watched the proceedings before the bench took up their matter after the lunch break.Some of the people who regularly attend the hearings of the Jessica murder case on behalf of some of the accused, were seen following Singh while he was taken into CBI custodyCourtesy: The Hindu & Indian Express
posted by Aditya Raj Kaul @ 3:01 PM 0 comments

Mattoo case conviction a "victory of judicial system": Friends
In Picture,Shri Agnishekhar (Chairman, Panun Kashmir ) and Aditya Raj Kaul Initiator, Justice For Priyadarshini.New Delhi, Oct 17: Ten years after he raped and killed Priyadarshini Mattoo, the conviction of Santosh Kumar Singh, son of a former IPS officer, by the Delhi High Court on Tuesday was hailed as a "victory of the judicial system"."Today is the victory of Indian judicial system and victory of the entire media, and the entire nation who stood behind us in this fight against injustice," said Aditya Raj Kaul, Initiator, Justice 4 Priyadarshini campaign."We have have faith in judiciary and this faith has increased 100 per cent. We never expected such a great response from judiciary as well as from the CBI," he added."I am very happy. Santosh is found guilty on both the accounts-- rape and murder. I know the family very well. Priyadarshini belonged to a very respectable family and it has gone through a very bad phase in last ten years by not receiving justice. Finally, they have something to feel good about," said Agnisheker, a family friend and a supporter of the campaign.Bureau Report
posted by Aditya Raj Kaul @ 1:44 PM 4 comments

Priyadarshini's Father:'This is justice; my daughter will rest in peace'
Chaman Lal Mattoo, Priyadarshini's Father."Finally justice has been delivered," said an exuburent Chaman Lal Mattoo on Tuesday after he heard of the conviction of Santosh Singh for raping and killing his daughter Priyadarshani Mattoo 10 years ago."I can't express myself. I have no words to express how I feel," Mattoo, who is in Himachal Pradesh, said on phone."Justice has been done. Common people in the country can now breathe with ease. This is a step in the right direction," said Mattoo. He added, "My daughter cannot come back. But at least, her soul will be in peace today."Mattoo thanked CBI Director Vijay Shanker for taking personal interest in the case.Facing The Mattoo’sby Aditya Raj KaulThe next day i.e. 18th October 2006, early in the morning I decided to gather some strength and call up Mattoo uncle and aunty. It was hard to face them. But I decided to give them a ring. When I called the voice at the other end told me that uncle was downstairs and asked me to call back after 5 minutes. But soon after my mobile rang, it was Shri Chaman Lal Mattoo...As soon as I heard Mr. Mattoo's voice, my heart started pounding; it felt as if the world had shrunk on me and the time had stopped. Mr. Mattoo was deeply appreciative of the efforts of each and every individual, organization and, in particular, media. It was hard for both of us to weave our emotions into words. Mattoo uncle thanked me and told me to convey the same to our entire team. He said that he was very eager to talk to me after the verdict but failed establishing contact with me.There was a lady behind who was insisting on speaking with me. Uncle handed over the phone to her, she was Rageshwariji (Priyadarshini’s mother)...Very emotionally she thanked me like anything, more than that she blessed me and the whole group. I’m unable to translate her Kashmiri expressions... I was touched...I could feel it very much that she was no doubt in pain of losing her dear child, but at the same time there was some sort of satisfaction and relief to her.I could feel a bruised, yet relieved, heart pouring all the love and affection in the world on me. There's only so much a man can take. Tears flowing down and heart screaming I wanted to console her and convey her that it was their strong conviction that helped the case most but I couldn't utter a word....
posted by Aditya Raj Kaul @ 1:30 PM 0 comments

Brother Speaks up...
Heymant Mattoo,Priyadarshini's brother.“I have mixed feelings right now because we did not expect that the verdict would have a positive outcome based on the previous judgement that was passed by the trial court. It was 50-50, and we did not know where the dice would land. So we are very happy right now and elated,” said Heymant Mattoo on Tuesday (October 17).“There was a lot of pressure from the media and a lot of pressure from the people who rallied for “Justice for Priyadarshini”. These are the people who worked very hard, who gave support to my father who was fighting alone for the last 8 to 9 years. So the courts had to put it on a fast track and deliver justice in good time,” said Heymant.Finally, when asked about the quantum of punishmen that he thought Santosh Singh deserved, Heymant Mattoo said: “Looking at the intensity of the crime, and what he has done to a young and budding girl, I think he should get the maximum sentence that the courts deem fit for this kind of crime.”Courtesy: Times Now
posted by Aditya Raj Kaul @ 1:08 PM 0 comments

10 Long Years: Justice finally delivered...
Lawyer & Friends of Santosh Singh attacking Media outside CourtConvict: Santosh Kumar Singh
posted by Aditya Raj Kaul @ 12:45 PM 3 comments
Wednesday, October 18, 2006

“Justice For Priyadarshini”… My experiences with the fight against injustice!
"Priyadarshini Mattoo" was the name that used to haunt me every now and then a few years back. I had heard and read a lot about this case, but never did I actually bother to see what had happened in the case and its current position. The picture in my mind was hazy.It was in February this year that Jessica Lall case was in the headlines, because of the acquittal of all the accused in the case. This verdict gave me a tremendous shock. I could never believe my eyes watching the criminals going scot free just because of the lack in investigation. That was the time when I realized that now is the time for the country’s youth to take charge. I used the best weapon at my end; which was writing. I wrote to editors of various newspapers, followed by discussions on this case in various youth forums and groups. I could not believe that a public outcry in this case immediately helped as the Delhi High Court took a sue motto notice. It had given me a hope, that we are united against injustice.During this time, another case, which I had earlier as well read about, caught my attention. It was the Priyadarshini Mattoo Case. Media was trying its best to highlight it as far as it could, but nothing really was coming out. My 12th board examinations were on but my mind was as well following this case.Priyadrshini Mattoo Case: A brief HistoryPriyadarshini was brutally raped and murdered on 23rd January 1996 in broad daylight in a posh South Delhi locality by his senior at the Law Faculty, Delhi University, Santosh Kumar Singh. The accused was son of a senior IPS officer.In the verdict given by Additional Sessions Judge on 3rd December 1999, Justice G.P. Thareja said, “ Though I know he is the man who committed the crime, I acquit him giving him the benefit of doubt.”The judge also went on record saying, “ The CBI in the matter of DNA evidence has not acted fairly. It tampered with the evidence of clothes of the deceased and also the blood sample of the accused. It even fabricated the documentary evidence and also the Malkhana Register of the CBI as is clear from the discrepancies.”The CBI filed its appeal challenging the courts verdict in the Delhi High Court in 2000, since then 7 years have passed without a single hearing of the case. It was a shame for the Indian Judiciary.Online Campaign Begins
On March 22nd this year when I read an article of Mr. C.L. Mattoo, Priyadarshini’s father, in a national daily, it sent shivers down my spine. My heart cried at the agony of the father, a father who had been fighting; for more than 10 years to get justice. I was determined to do something, which could still give some courage to him to fight this battle. Finally, on that very day I decided to start an online signature campaign, which had a petition addressed to the Honourable President of India and Chief Justice of India asking for retrial and reinvestigation in this case.I had found a new modern way for people to speak against injustice and discrimination. I was thrilled to get an overwhelming response from people across the world; thousands of signatures were collected, my inbox was filled with mails and at every nook and corner people were discussing about this very case. It was towards the end of my board examination in March when NDTV contacted me for a story on my petition. The story was telecasted the next day. Later that day, NDTV asked me to come for a very special live panel discussion. I was asked for my opinion and what motivated me to start this campaign. I clearly remember the last question by the anchor Nidhi Razdan: Are u hopeful that justice will be done in the Mattoo Case? After a brief gap…. I replied “No, not at this moment”Later, another channel CNN-IBN covered a story on my petition, and I was again invited for the evening live panel discussion with Rajdeep Sardesai on the ‘Face The Nation’. It was a bit similar experience.Our Team : “Justice For Priyadarshini”Even though the case was on and off the media's attention, not much was happening on the ground. But I decided to take this forward upon request from all my friends and others. Many youth contacted me from around the world, mostly from India. After brief research of two months in this case me and my friends decided to form a group of volunteers who were determined to work for the cause. This led to the formation of “Justice For Priyadarshini”, which soon became our campaign name.A friend from USA who was actively involved with me in this group introduced me to his sister a journalist working in Delhi with one of the top media houses who was interested to work for this cause. In our first meeting, we decided to meet Mr. C.L. Mattoo, Priyadarshini’s father.It was on May 4th that our small group comprising of me, that journalist friend and another of her friend, took the courage to meet Priyadarshini’s father. On the one hand my heart and mind was involved with the anti-reservation protests, but my soul was stuck with justice for Priyadarshini. This was the day when President of India invited me and my group for talks on reservations.It was hard for us to face a father who had completely lost the courage to move on. As we entered his room, he greeted us and directed us to make ourselves comfortable. After the introduction, he told me that there is a young boy who has just finished his 12th and had started a campaign for this case. He asked us to contact him. I was surprised as he was referring to me. The journalist friend sitting with me introduced me as that very boy who had started that petition. The moment he heard this he stood up and hugged me, he thanked me for unknowingly helping him. I could see drops of tears coming out his eyes. I could feel my heart crying, I was motion less. I did not know what to say. I replied that it was my duty to raise my voice being an Indian citizen. Though I wanted to say more, I stopped. At the end of the meeting he asked me to continue my efforts, I assured him that day, that I will do whatever I can in my capacity to get justice. The journalist girl with me was equally enthusiastic about this case. She decided to study the case in detail and then work on it technically. She was with me in this campaign at each and every step. I felt Mr. Mattoo was now somewhat hopeful of justice being done as the youth had taken charge.I believe this was the first day of our campaign and gradually more people started to volunteer for the cause. We decided to have a protest march on 23rd of July, which was Priyadarshini’s 34th birth anniversary.We started working hard towards our goal, organising door-to-door campaigns, meeting various groups and individuals for support became a regular affair. In a short span of time, more than 25 Delhi based civil society groups, NGO’s, women’s bodies, students groups etc. pledged their support for this cause. One of the first groups to lend a helping hand was Delhi University based students neutral group United Students, who had started the anti-reservation campaign in the country. They mobilized nearly each and every college in the campus area by distributing pamphlets, sticking posters, organising corner meetings etc. Even the faculty and students of the Law Faculty, Delhi University where Priyadarshini used to study, joined this movement. Many other organizations like Jagori, People’s Action and Human Rights Law Network just to name a few raised their voice for this cause.Just days before the protest Mr. C.L. Mattoo decided to visit Delhi to support the group and raise this issue on a larger scale in front of the media. We organized a joint press conference, which strongly demanded an “immediate reinvestigation and retrial within a stipulated timeframe”. This conference became the headlines next day. In the meantime many electronic, print and radio media organizations extended their support to the cause.The Protest that shook the Country
Finally, came the day that we were awaiting, it was 23rd July. The entire group was nervous, we had spent the previous night planning strategies, discussing various other things and completing last minute work for the protest. As we moved to the protest site, India Gate, a few hours before the protest, we got a message that our venue was shifted to Jantar Mantar due to some last minute security concerns. It was a very hard decision to change the venue; we hardly had any option, other then to follow the advice of the Police.We immediately decided to plant our volunteers on different corners of India Gate to direct people towards the changed venue. I had never expected this last minute change, this was a shock, but we had to tackle it and make our rally a great success.I checked the time in my wristwatch, it showed 4:30 pm, the scheduled time for our protest to start. I took a round of Jantar Mantar. I tried to figure the exact number of people present. The figure was shocking; there were hardly 25 people with 30 journalists standing and staring at this small crowd. I had anticipated a much larger figure. I was disheartened.After a few minutes, I jumped with excitement when I got a call from a volunteer standing at India Gate, he told me to be prepared, hundreds of people had already landed at India Gate and were now directed towards Jantar Mantar. My elation knew no bounds when I saw countless number of cars and other vehicles coming from the Janpath side road towards Jantar Mantar. I was re-energised.Media swung into action. The electronic media started their OB vans, with live coverage as the protest began. Photographers struggled to get space. Entire Jantar Mantar was full of people. Soon after, many personalities who had pledged their support for the cause landed at the venue, it included actors Anupam Kher, Roshan Seth and M.K. Raina, politician and activist Manika Gandhi and film director Ashok Pandit. Even Neelam Katara, mother of the murdered Nitish Katara, who has been also fighting for justice, joined us in the rally.The air reverberated with slogans like, “We Want Justice” and “Justice Delayed is Justice Denied”. The depth in that one united voice from the crowd touched my strings of my heart. It was totally different atmosphere, a new experience for me.CBI ActionThe very next day CBI filed an early hearing petition in the High Court due to immense public and media pressure. The High Court heard the case on August 30th and set it for regular hearing on daily basis.The case continued for a month, around 14 hearings and finally the judgement came on October 17th 2006.The Judgement Day: First Hand ExperienceThe entire country was eagerly awaiting the Judgement which was scheduled to come in the afternoon on 17th of October 2006. I was sitting in the Delhi High Court, praying in my heart. The criminal, Santosh Kumar Singh was sitting in the next row in front. The judges entered the court at about 2:15 pm, Justice Sondhi announced the verdict before the jampacked court in complete silence. The Judge said, “From an overall analysis of circumstances that have been discussed above and held to have been proved beyond any doubt by unimpeachable evidence, we are of the view that those circumstances form a chain so complete which leads us to the only conclusion that it is the respondent, Santosh Kumar Singh, who had committed rape upon the deceased and then murdered her.”Immediately, after this statement I could see Santosh’s face turning pale and his lawyers as if mourning in grief. The Judge continued, “ The circumstantial evidence in the case is absolutely inconsistent and incompatible with the innocence of the respondent. There is no circumstance brought on record by the respondent suggesting his innocence or the possibility of anyone else having committed the ghastly acts. The trial court, however quite amazingly, after holding almost all the crucial circumstances in favour of the prosecution, has ordered unmerited acquittal of the respondent by taking a perverse approach in the matter. By acquitting the respondent despite being convinced that there was no doubt in the prosecution case (at least for the offence of murder) the trial court has mauled justice, its decision has shocked the conscience of this court.”I took a deep breath and a sense of relief…finally truth had won and justice had been done. Santosh Kumar Singh, the cruel murderer had been convicted and immediately arrested by the CBI. Media inside the court rushed out of the court, to cover the event live and first. This case is historic in many ways.To capture the historic event; it was history in the making right in front of everyone's eyes.This case will set a precedent for all similar future cases. But the delay in this verdict is a cause of concern. Judiciary needs to set a stipulated time-frame for all extra special cases of murder, rape and national security etc. The Judicial process in India is very time consuming, and no one is sure of light at the end of the tunnel. Judiciary also needs to be overhauled in order to expeditiously deliver justice.It is unfortunate that the investigating agencies be it the Police or the top most CBI, have been found lacking in discharging their duties. Its high time that they get awakened from their deep slumber to discharge their duties in a systematic manner.Facing The Mattoo’sThe next day i.e. 18th October 2006, early in the morning I decided to gather some strength and call up Mattoo uncle and aunty. It was hard to face them. But I decided to give them a ring. When I called the voice at the other end told me that uncle was downstairs and asked me to call back after 5 minutes. But soon after my mobile rang, it was Shri Chaman Lal Mattoo...As soon as I heard Mr. Mattoo's voice, my heart started pounding; it felt as if the world had shrunk on me and the time had stopped. Mr. Mattoo was deeply appreciative of the efforts of each and every individual, organization and, in particular, media. It was hard for both of us to weave our emotions into words. Mattoo uncle thanked me and told me to convey the same to our entire team. He said that he was very eager to talk to me after the verdict but failed establishing contact with me.There was a lady behind who was insisting on speaking with me. Uncle handed over the phone to her, she was Rageshwariji (Priyadarshini’s mother)...Very emotionally she thanked me like anything, more than that she blessed me and the whole group. I’m unable to translate her Kashmiri expressions... I was touched...I could feel it very much that she was no doubt in pain of losing her dear child, but at the same time there was some sort of satisfaction and relief to her.I could feel a bruised, yet relieved, heart pouring all the love and affection in the world on me. There's only so much a man can take. Tears flowing down and heart screaming I wanted to console her and convey her that it was their strong conviction that helped the case most but I couldn't utter a word....Our VerdictWe at “Justice For Priyadarshini” firmly believe that the Priyadarshini Mattoo case fits into the category of “rarest of the rare” and hence the guilty should be awarded the death penalty.Though there are philosophical reasons for being against death penalty, I think death penalty should be struck upon the culprit so that spoilt brats of power know that they are not above the law. It will set precedence and act as a deterrent.
************************************************************************************

UNITED STUDENTS - An Initiative by People's ActionLets together make a difference...United Students, a Delhi University based neutral group would be working on various issues in the coming months and requires active participation from all of you. If you are ready to go out in the open and make a difference, contact any of our coordinators who will further guide you.United Students has been already campaigning for issues like Reservations,Jessica Lall and Priyadarshini Mattoo Case,RTI,Campus security etc.Currently we are campaigning for the registration of Voter ID Cards in DU.Since the organisation is volunatry, time commitment is flexible.Regards,For Further Details Contact :-Dhruv Suri - dhruvsuri@gmail.comAaditya Dar - aadityadar@gmail.comNikhita Arora - nikhita_arora@yahoo.co.inAditya Raj Kaul - adityarajkaul@gmail.comDevika Mallik - devika_malik@yahoo.comUnited Students -E-mail - unitedstudents.india@gmail.comWebsite - www.unitedstudents.tkUnited Students @ ORKUThttp://www.orkut.com/Community.aspx?cmm=13038478UNITED STUDENTS @ Yahoo Groupshttp://groups.yahoo.com/group/united_students/Blog - www.unitedstudents.blogspot.comPlease spread this message to all your friends...

Where The Mind Is Without Fear...- by RABINDERANATH TAGORE
"Where the mind is without fear and the head is held high;Where knowledge is free;Where the world has not been broken up into fragments by narrow domestic walls;Where words come out from the depth of truth; Where tireless striving stretches its arms towards perfection; Where the clear stream of reason has not lost its way into the dreary desert sand of dead habit;Where the mind is lead forward by thee into ever-widening thought and action- Into that heaven of freedom, my Father, let my country awake."
I have always loved reading this poem...I believe in it...!

Previous Posts
Mattoo case: Santosh Kumar Singh gets death penal...
HC to decide on sentence - The Final Judgement Day...
Hope ignites for Kataras
Jessica’s sister witnesses conviction
Mattoo case conviction a "victory of judicial system": Friends
Priyadarshini's Father:'This is justice; my daughter will rest in peace'
Brother Speaks up...
10 Long Years: Justice finally delivered...
“Justice For Priyadarshini”… My experiences with t...
"Wake Me Up When September Ends" ...

Saturday, August 12, 2006

Save India from Communalistic Politics

Communalism in Secular India

This was a title of a book by Mr. M. J. Akbar soon after the massacre and chaos of 1993 (the post Babri Mosque Demolition Era) as I refer to it.

As a teenager then I was deeply affected by what was happening and I started reading to find the answers to the many questions that arose in my mind… I still continue till date.

Babri Masjid / Ayodhya was followed by the shameless and ruthless massacre in Gujarat in February 2002 and in a way one led to the other. Wanting to find out what ‘communalism’ meant and why religion had become such a huge inseparable part of politics in India was the burning question.

The term “communal violence” in the Indian context refers to violence between religious communities (mainly between the majority and the minority i.e. the Hindus and Muslims). However, in context to the Gujarat incidents, observers have pointed out that the term “communal violence” is inappropriate to describe events that transpired in Gujarat in 2002. “The events in Ahmedabad do not fit into any conceivable definition of a communal riot. All evidence suggests that what happened there was a completely one-sided and targeted carnage of innocent Muslims, something much closer to a pogrom. Moreover selective violence that was perpetrated was done with remarkable precision, suggesting meticulous planning over a protracted period, rather than the spontaneous mob frenzy characteristic of communal riot.” Sahmat, Ethnic cleansing in Ahmedabad: Preliminary report, 2002. Similarly a fact-finding mission led by Kamal Mitra Chenoy said, “the events in Gujarat do not constitute a communal riot … the bulk of the violence that followed (the incident at Godhra) was state-backed and one-sided violence against the Muslims tantamount to a deliberate program”. Chenoy et al, Gujarat carnage 2002, 2002. 2 In this report, the phrase ‘right wing Hindus’ or ‘Hindu groups’ refers to those that support the ideology of Hindutva, a political ideology which sees India as a nation exclusively of Hindus and regards Muslims as a threatening ‘enemy’. ‘Right wing Hindus’ or the extremists are often members of organizations affiliated with this ideology including the RSS, BJP or Bajrang Dal.

Mumbai Riots and the communal carnage that might follow:

With their back to the wall and the real prospects of losing power what would the Pakistan army do other than resurface with all their strength with the 'India bogey' which apparently has been their lucky charm all along in the last couple of decades and along with that start communal trouble in India. A scenario conveyed to the Indian government, but frankly one did not expect it to happen so quickly.
The Indian political establishment is indirectly responsible for the Mumbai carnage by the terrorists, now and all the times earlier. For after every terrorist outrage, our political leadership of both the Congress and Bharatiya Janata Party has been vociferous in stressing that the peace process with Pakistan will continue and not be derailed by terrorist violence. Thus, the terrorists, both from across the border and their henchmen in India, have been testing the limits of Indian patience and tolerance.
The handlers of local terrorists from across the border know well that India has failed to fashion a response to the strategy of 'a thousand cuts to bleed India for a thousand years.' The empty threat of Operation Parakram and the defensive response during the Kargil War have proved to the Pakistanis that Indian rage is impotent. We lack the military muscle and the wherewithal to launch the kind of counter insurgency or counter attack on our esteemed neighbour, or rather what we lack is the political gumption to stand up for what is beneficial to the public at large and are always worried about what the world at large primarily the Big Brother of us all is likely to think and react. This is the second failing of the Indian government, starving the Indian security forces of funds and equipment for decades.
The citizen of this country that pays so much of tax, the least that such a citizen can expect out of the government is security. One wonders what is the legal recourse (if any) when the government and its actions / inactions are a threat to life of the public at large.
But we cannot deal with terrorism unless we tackle the domestic roots of this menace. Let us not delude ourselves and believe that all these terrorist acts are possible without local support and sympathy. One would not be surprised that while the tools for the blasts may have come from Pakistan, locals may well have carried out the actual act.
But a Gujarat-like reaction and communal riots would be precisely what the terrorists want. It would be foolish if Indians react that way. Infact that part of the minority community that is truly against these acts of terrors and who are the true patriots should become pro-active and hunt these sympathizers of terrorism down. This is the only way that terrorism can be controlled. Like fish without water, terrorists cannot operate without popular support. Consideration of faith should not come in the way of citizens doing their duty. This apathy would be a monumental folly on their part.
Elsewhere in the world when such incidents happen, you will find blaring sirens from ambulances and police vehicles, stretchers, trained volunteers and doctors. Everything in a matter of minutes.
One can understand our lack of preparedness if the incident had taken place at a remote place. But it happened in Mumbai, the commercial capital of the country. It happened in a city, which has been high on the target list of dreaded Islamic terrorists. And don't forget that every one in the government and outside knew about it.
The menace of terrorism in politics continues in many states like Gujarat with the likes of Narendra Modi continuing office. So much so that when he visits other states (for e.g. a recent visit to Mumbai) the people of that state are worried as to the contents of his speech, whether inflammatory or passive.
I believe as a political science student I was once taught that the ‘people deserve the government they get’. I wonder on this issue a lot. The answer of course is a yes and a no. Yes because there are so many people who refuse to vote for lack of a clear choice, ( all are bad and each one worse than the other) and those who vote for all the wrong reasons ( money, power, position etc).
ROOT CAUSE OF ALL PROBLEMS
Overpopulation is the root cause of all the problems whether poverty, unemployment or security. This has mainly hampered the growth and development in Mumbai in the last five years or maybe more. The slums are growing at an alarming pace, and the governments being as impotent as ever in taking a drastic step in stopping migration into this city. The city is spruced up once in a while when visited by some political leader or the other.
No one wants to injure their political career by ordering demolition of the slums and those celebrities who stand up for them and protect them should be held responsible for all the mayhem created by way of floods or security hazards. A couple of days a leading news paper carried an article that the slums were causing a danger to the Mumbai pipeline, pray what action is our Chief Minister going to take on that aspect one wonders !

The K tears

The "K" tears




THE ASSAULT ON “FAMILY VALUES”

HYPOCRISY PERSONIFIED
A lot is said in the media about the Saas bahu serials and a lot is left to be said …….. the propaganda from it being family serials and those profound family values it is supposed to present as also the so called political mileage some parties have taken by using the “ family oriented” characters to support their campaigns is a laugh.

The bottom line is that all that these serials propogate is adultery ( a purrrrfect justification for a marriage to another in the presence of an existing spouse ) all in the name of a kid, though one would wonder about the legal justifications of the same, and what a house full of women could not have brought her up with the motherly love which could only be given after “the marriage” to a man who in the name of love stood up against the entire family… the ease with which illegitimate children are enfolded in the FAMILY ….

The horror is not in their telecast of these serials but in the TRP ratings and the “award” functions for the tv serials which most of us are convinced are “bought for the asking”. Common one look at sites such as www.indiatelevision.com and a look at their punching bag entries ( the term is self explanatory) surely shows the popularity of these serials by the frequency / repetition of these names ooooops terms “saas” “bahu” . Don’t think that five years back anyone in India could have spoken about these two terms in one breath.


Posted on:
By:
2004-01-31 02:54:50
Rashmi Dixit
WHAT SHALL HAPPEN IF FOLLOWING DEEDS ARE RESTRICTED IN K....... SERIALS 1) Overhearing behind walls. 2) Listening from parallel phone. 3) Doors with transperent glasses. 4) Office kept open when there is no person inside. 5)Important papers and files kept readily available


Posted on:
By:
2001-12-01 06:33:26
Parbati Rana
the serials on tv especially of ekta kapoor are awful. they are only creating misunderstanding between different kinds of realtionship . An individual must have not thought of the ideas what she is showing. and now they are all rubbish and stupid searials , nust be taken off air or changed

Posted on:
By:
2001-11-15 01:50:54
Hemant Sarin
Gosh.... the whole balaji hype is really getting too much now. In such a fast paced world where people are becoming practical, as it has taken years for a woman to break 'those created myths' by the so called soceity. Now she has decided to get them back and make the life of the women is semi-urban and rural miserable since media is a very powerful medium to influence people and their thoughts and beliefs. Somebody stop this women and tell her to make some meaningful serials and show which are progressive in nature. enough of all the meaningless timefilling gaps by showing 'flashbacks' (kskbt) and those sad tunes whenever tulsi comes of screens. Just because a particular hit the highest trp that does not mean that people will take the same shit again and again which has the same look and feel and sometimes the same characters.... there are time you get totally confused, as to see what serial we are watching
Posted on:
By:
2001-10-25 02:10:54
Dolly Rajan
hey u guys i think ekta kapoor should revisit her serial kkusum's concept or storyline. all her characters in the serial have a same problem extra marital. looks like she is against the inadian values and customs. plzzzzzzzz can someone give her some brains and tell her all marriages dont have same problem lots of arranged married couples are very happy with there married life

Posted on:
By:
2001-09-29 01:42:32
Natarajan
We, a group of 4 TV aficianados, are fed up with the kitch and cliches, with unrealistic twists dished out now in the two most hyped serials on Star Plus 'Kyonki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi' and 'Ghar ghar Ki Kahani' .Thanks, to other channels,they they have given good alternatives for us during these slots, one of them is at least tolerable on Zee as 'Aap Jo bolen Haan to Haan... Naa to Naa'.If Balaji Telefilms, like their share value on the bourses, have lost shin in the creative field, then better they wind up this and start something fresh on these two slots. Till somtime back, we were also the admirers of Sony's matinee serial 'Kaun Apna Kaun Paraya', when it was going on the right track with consistency. Once a strong character like Somnath Arya is built up, it is indeed pity, that the writers and director have now reduced that icon character to a mere pitiable caricature, which does not even invoke our sympthy as he is demeaning himself and his wife accepting helplessness. If the strong character like S Arya surrenders so meekly to the absurds, then what role model they are putting before the audience? Have they not seen even earlier blockbuster films like 'Avtaar', to derive the required inspiration ? If possible, you may please convey these viewer feedback to the producers or the channels. Thanks
Posted on:
By:
2001-09-28 02:56:03
Mohan Siroya
whats gone wrong with ekta kapooor ..why do all her serials lose track n get boring be it kggk till a while back ,ksbkbt ythat one doesnt feel like watching it any longer wich is a pity coz it was a good serial ....koshish ek asha or then evebn kusu m ..in kusum why does she always have to show sorrows n pauin n more pain n more sorrows after marriage !! first her husband doesnt love her then we find out he is having an extra marital affair then her sister gets married oin the same house as she n then she starets having problems with her sister ...then as things start gettng ok with her husband ...what will happen now ..!!??? frankly speaking i dont want to know n dont care!!! all these serial make one NOT believe in the very instution of marriage !cmon ekta give us a break ....we r not foools!!!!!!



Posted on:
By:
2001-08-02 11:04:00
Kaustubh
Will anyone please put some ideas into Ekta Kapoor's fast exhausting mind. Let there be some creativity and uniqueness in serials. We are bugged of the saas-bahu tales... To add fire to that is mandira's confession in kyunki saas bhi kabhi bahu thi - that shes pregnant and the father is mihir. now this is getting too much what does ekta kapoor think the audience is - a dumb bunch or what...to whom she can dish out any crap in the name of a story. will anyone please find some good scripts for the entertainment of the audience

Kahaani Ghar Ghar kii of late has become one of the most illogical shows of recent times after time transition.First we are giving to believe that Ajay's daughter who is at leat ten years younger than Shruti is in the same college. But inspite of some meek jusitfication, it is a hard pill to swallow. Then Krishna has passed out of college while Shruti is still in college. Either she is the female version of Pter Pan... or just too dumb. They(makers) profess that it is a 18 year transition... by that calculation, Shruti should be 30 years. But no, she is still in college(though she looks near Parvati's age is, of course a different matter altogether!!!). We swallow all this. But for the last one month, this serial has become unpalatable. There are too many rain scenes, too many near sex scenes which are not adding to the story in any case. Have the Agarwals shifted to Cherrapunji???? Except for the girl playing Monalika, the entire new generation is a collection of very bad actors.Kahaani Ghar Ghar Kii has one plus point - that its actors could carry off the most inane scene with aplomb. But now, the best scenes are ruined on performance. That girl who is playing Shruti, reminds one of a fish... with her lips always parted. At first, at least she looked decent in suits, but now in her western look, her backside could even put Asha Parekh's at shame!!! The less said about the Aryan character, the better!!! To call him even a bad actor, is insulting the word 'ACTOR'. We used to be interseted in watching this serial to see the trials and tribulations of Parvati. But she is the least seen nowadays. The actress holds the screen mesmeringly, carrying off scenes just on her performance. IT it was a pleasure watching her. But now, alas, she is just in a scene or two. No wonder, the serial has tripped big time. Last, but not least, so called 'romantic scenes' between miss fish and mr. wood block, border on obscenity, that one would rather watch alternative serials than this crap. Kudos to ekta kapoor, for having guts not only to cast Mr. Wood Block as her new gen. hero, but also repeat her flop heroine of the eminently magnum opus KAHANI TERRI MERRI as Shruti. Ekta has guts and it shows in her new casting of her this seeped-in-values serial. KEEP IT UP EKTA!!!! PS : Copying Kyonki in doing the time transtion is one thing, but try to match its quality, Ekta. YOuth is not the answer... good content backed with godd actors are. Remember the forte of this serial is its old performers not htis new pack of jokers that you have cast!
Posted on:
By:
2004-01-06 09:54:31
shilpa



One is forced to think, is this all that the entertainment industry can come up with… are there such dearth of ideas and talents, where story and screenplay is concerned and why are the so called “educated” masses encouraging such a sad portrayal of women in these serials. What’s the difference between these and the “Bold and the Beautiful” which was once so widely discussed politically as propaganda of incest and taboo… if that is so I beg to ask Ms. Kapoor what is the moral behind these serials… are we headed towards liberalization or a moral hara-kiri.
Soaps that cast a spell
With a plethora of soaps to tune in to, the small screen is a major source of entertainment and relaxation, and attracts viewers across the country.
"Kahani Ghar Ghar Ki" on STAR Plus
AN AUNT of mine recently returned after a six-week tour abroad. The only thing, she said, that had remained static during the period she was away was the progress of the mega Hindi serials on television. "I could just pick up from where I left off and follow the story," she quipped, with a glint in her eyes. This seems to be the general accusation against Hindi serials that they move only at a snail's pace and have too many breaks for commercials.
I got to watching these serials only a year ago and now it has become a matter of habit with me," said Dr. Mrs. Rao of Ayanavaram. Her objection was to most serials revolving round the `other woman'. "What about women's liberation? Thrown to the winds?" She bitterly asks. The heroine, the epitome of patience, is shown waiting for her husband to return. Dr. Mrs. Rao feels that such situations are obsolete. The modern woman armed with sound education would walk out on her husband in no time. She cites "Hum Pardesi Ho Gaye" and "Kusum" on Sony TV as being `other woman' syndrome serials.
For the rest, 90 per cent of the serials are produced by Balajee Telefilms and hence, centre only round the family, focussing on mother-in-law - daughter-in-law relationships (Monopoly by one banner affords no incentive for innovation and variety) as is the case with "Kahani Ghar Ghar Ki", "Kahin Kissi Roz" and "Kyonki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi". In contrast, the South can boast of big banners like Min Bimbangal, AVM, Madras Talkies, Radaan etc., which produce regularly for the small screen. Consequently, the themes seem to be as varied as those dealing with police excesses (`Kaveri'), labour problems (`Indra'), journalists' world (`Aarti'), and the like.
The emphasis on story content is more pronounced here. Women like Bharathiyar's `Pudumai Penn' have crossed the threshold and moved away from the hearth and homes to redress wrongs and fight injustice.
The scripts are heroine-oriented and the silver screen heroines who play these lead roles provide the star value. A major drawback in both the North and South is that the artistes fail to stay committed till the end and hence change of faces for the roles is becoming increasingly common. To the dismay of viewers there was a change of hero overnight in the serial "Kalash".
Another observation is that there has been the growth of a new clan of music directors all for the Tamil small screen - Dhina, Rehan and Imam and the like. A lot of importance is attached to the title song, resulting in catchy tunes rendered by big names on the playback scene such as Kavitha Krishnamurthy, Hariharan, Shankar Mahadevan, Sadhana Sargam, Nityashree, S.P.B. and K. J. Yesudas. Dr.Rao confesses to enjoying watching "Kahin Kissi Roz" starring Sudha Chandran as the villainous mother-in-law.
Though styled in the mould of yesteryear film "Khoon Bhari Maang" she adds that it has enough intrigue to sustain her interest.
Businessman H. Vasudev Jumani of Egmore is very much for the commercials in between the serials. They are needed to support the programmes he claims in true business-like fashion.
From "Kyunki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi" on STAR Plus.
Committed to watching serials for relaxation from the DD days of soaps like "Hum Log" to the latest "Shagun" he feels the storylines are interesting. He is a faithful "STAR" gazer too and views all serials on the Star Channel from the light "Tu Tu Main Main" to "Desh Me Nikala Hoga Chand" "Kasauti Zindagi Ki" and, of course, "Kaun Banega Crorepathi." He affirms that Amitabh is Amitabh with none to equal him.
He also enjoys "Ganesh Puran" for the story and "Vishnu Puran" for the appealing manner in which they are filmed and the religious fervour they inspire.
And finally for a word with English-cum-Hindi teacher, Sudha Vyas. She says she watches Hindi serials because they eschew violence.
They revolve round the family and true-to-life problems. As they avoid obscenity they are ideal for family viewing. An additional point in their favour is that they are telecast again the next afternoon for the benefit of viewers. Her favourites are "Kahani Ghar Ghar Ki" and "Kyonki Saas Bhiu Kabhi Bahu Thi."
But what seems most evident after talking to the viewers is that families, both in the North and South, continue to avidly watch television during their spare time.
THARA MOHAN RAO
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
Metro Plus
This is an article in the Hindu as far back as 2002.

This is an article from The Tribune, Chandigarh April 7, 2002.
Glorifying retrogressive patternsNeelu Kang
Man for the field and woman for the hearth;
Man for the sword and for the needle she;
Man with the head and woman with the heart;
Man to command and woman to obey;
All else confusion.
— Alfred Tennyson
This is what most of the, even so-called "women-oriented", soap operas on TV project, be it Kyon Ki Saas Bhi Kabhi Bahu Thi (KSBKB), Koi Apna Sa (KAS), Saans, Kkusum, Desh Mein Nikla Ho Ga Chand (DMNC), Sanskriti, Shagun, Kahani Ghar Ghar Ki (KGGK), Kasauti, Kabhi Soutein Kabhi Saheli (KSKS), Mehndi Tere Naam Ki (MTNK), Kutumb, Hum Pardesi, Ho Gaye (HPGC), Kangan, Wajood and the list goes on.
The analysis of these serials would raise many feminist issues. These serials massively disseminate the discourse on domesticity stemming from Manu’s composition of the man-woman relationship. She is helping men to achieve their goals and adjusting to man’s needs. Her life revolves around men of the family. In Sanskriti, the dead husband is the supreme mentor and life is devoted to fulfill his dreams.
The argument is that these representations glorify patriarchal values and women’s victimisation. They reinforce and perpetuate stereotypes and gender roles. Instances are unlimited e.g. neglected and deserted Tulsi’s return to her in-laws family in KSBKB or wife’s worship of the husband who rejects her and has a relationship outside marriage in Kkusum. Women are shown caught up in domesticity where they do everything for others but for themselves. In Shagun a young widow is committed to her husband and refuses to remarry because her dharma prescribes so. To top it all, to save her family honour, she becomes ready to mother the illegitimate child of her sister-in-law and declares herself as the biological mother of the child.
All serials wrapped in tradition of male chauvinism encourage women to aim for nothing more than a loving husband, happy children and a modern home. She is shown as passive and subservient portrayed as a glamour doll whose physical beauty is her only asset.
The sacrificing role of a woman in every serial is highlighted, as it poses no threat to the patriarchal structure. Women are all the time compromising and negotiating rather than refusing. The sacrificing wife of a mentally retarded husband, who goes to another woman when he becomes normal, is applauded in Koshish.
The dominant structure of patriarchy in the form of a joint family indulges in early domestication of bride. She submits not only to her husband but to her in-laws and grand-in-laws’ and this trend is found in all serials. In Des Mein Nikla...Pammi can’t dare to marry her beloved against her parents’ wishes since she is obliged to them for giving birth to her and bringing her up. Even if she rebels, she does that only to forget and forgive the man soon and hopes to have a supposedly happy relationship thereafter. She redefines her role and function only when she forcibly becomes single, e.g. in Saans, Kkusum, Kasauti..., the women only attempt to become economically independent when their men leave them. On the extreme end, the woman is shown as a bitchy character who plays politics and breaks families. This is very demeaning. A woman is projected either as a devi or a devil, a static personality. She is either docile, dependent or holy or she is a vamp who creates problems and indulges in extramarital affairs. She is arrogant, hostile, jealous and loses her anger on all other women of the family. A woman is not shown as a human being, a dynamic character, with combination of all emotions, whose temperament and attitude can change according to circumstances.
The mother-in-law and sister-in-law is always depicted in a negative manner (Kyonki Saas Bhi... Kasauti) except the grand-mother-in-law, who has mellowed down with age and is relatively empowered to control others.
The present serials can also be criticised for glorifying the concept of motherhood. A woman is pinned down through a justification of womanhood that narrowly focuses on procreation. In KSBK, KSKS, KAS and Shagun, women find themselves incomplete and useless if they are unable bear a child. On the other hand a man with seven daughters in Amanat is projected as a bechara, almost as if he has committed a crime.
Serials like Kundali, Shagun KSBKB Kkusum are emphasising superstitions and fatalism in Kkusum, Abhey gets married to Kusum only to avoid his death predicted by pandits whereas he never accepts her as his wife. In KSBKB, women are shown as superstitious and emotional and men as rational.
These soap operas affect women more simply because the latter are watching them more then men. Men spend maximum time outside whereas women are confined to home. Moreover, men like to watch horror shows like Aahat, crime shows like Bhanwar or India’s Most Wanted etc. Another reason for their immense popularity among women, particularly housewives, is that they provide already established and identifiable images appealing to their emotions and sentiments (in an over-exaggerated way). Women easily identify themselves with the character and feel their pain and rejoice in their pleasure.
However, professional women are not getting adequate representation in these serials. Rather most of them are quite sick of serial produced by Balaji Films. "Most of the serials are family-oriented, focusing only on the saas-bahu conflict. These are day-to-day problems, which every one is facing and handling in their own way. These problems will persist. Thus media should focus on some thing different", says Gurmeet, a college lecturer. "These serials cater to the emotional and psychological needs of women who are free and have nothing constructive or productive to do", says Aarti, a volunteer in an NGO. Many of these women found Saans and Kora Kagaz sensible at least in the beginning and Heena the most idiotic where a woman is shown absolutely dumb without any self-identity and self-respect. "I watch them in the beginning with the hope of some unconventional ideas to be unfolded in the up coming episodes. But gradually they all become the same", says Geeta, a lawyer. Anu, a computer engineer, finds only Ji Mantri ji on Zee TV and Buniyaad on DD worth watching.
Many women are of the opinion that these serials reflect experiences of a majority of the women. This is not true because women either as construction or domestic or as agricultural workers are not shown at all. Uneducated rural women, struggling in their day-to-day life, but at the same time economically productive, are not touched upon. Countless educated women working independently and striding ahead towards their goals are hardly shown on TV.
Even if woman’s representation in these serials is relevant and applicable to the conditions of women in general as Geeta, a housewife feels, why can’t media smash them off rather than reinforcing it? Don’t we need transformative and critical media to check it? Hasn’t the time arrived to present women in the spirit of equality with men, women redefining themselves with their own identity, self-awareness and self confidence and women recovering their loss identities. Earlier, construction of knowledge and control on production of knowledge was in male hands and the tradition was to observe women as passive objects and project then in the same way. As a result both artists and spectators got caught in the same image. Feminists advocated involvement of more women in media production because women often perceive the world differently. Asha Parekh, Aruna Irani, and Neena Gupta are producing serials as is Ekta Kapoor. But they also face fierce criticism from the educated class. They can’t be blamed as their idea of women is shaped and controlled by male discourse and they have internalised male ideology. The need of the hour is to conscentise media people and steps should be taken by women at the helm.”

And what is sad and hurts most are that women enjoy watching this serial most, what does that go to prove? Guess it just proves the old adage right that women are their own enemies and one woman can actually derive “entertainment” and “relaxation” from the plight of another as portrayed in these serials.

Alvida hi kehna

Rona-dhona becomes the second name for Kabhi Alvida na Kehna, the jolly good fella bits seem to be in short supply and the aam janata ends up feeling gypped. Primarily because it doesn’t know why Rani relentlessly sobs and Shah Rukh goes gruff-gruff and all those designer marriages suck... Okay, we know that Shah Rukh’s angry because he's got a perpetual limp, he can’t play football, his wife’s (Preity Zinta) more successful than him. But is that reason enough to fall in love with a wannabe bride (Rani) he meets on a bench one New Yorky afternoon as she ruminates on this whole marriage business and the grand mohabbat myths? And is that reason enough to pout permanently in the film as he goes through the entire gamut of incompatibility, infidelity, separation and reunion, barking down on anybody who happens to cross his path. Even his bechara beta! Unconvincing again are the reasons (which are still beyond my understanding) behind Rani’s drift. All that hubby Abhishek demands from her is a bit of passion in bed, some rock-and-roll in dad’s (Amitabh) rocking party and a bit of camaraderie in their day-to-day life. Is that asking for too much from a fridgid Miss whose G spot could obviously be identifies by another morose SRK in that one night only...?So, on the one hand you have a weak foundation to the extra-marital affair between Shah Rukh and Rani, and on the other, you have a weird reason that brings them together. The duo befriend each other to play marriage counsellor to each other, discussing books and techniques on ‘how to save your shaadi and stay happy forever’. And guess what? They end up breaking their marriages and biting into cold TV dinners by themselves. If the film holds, it’s because of the few dramatic moments that manage to touch you, a pretty New York backdrop and some fine chemistry between that father-son duo again. Amitabh and Abhishek once again create magic when they are together, even as the big daddy of Bollywood creates one of the most flamboyant playboys on the desi screen. Unfortunately, its a karan johar movie and SRK steels footage and they have very little screen time together. All in all I felt I was sitting through one one of Ekta Kapoors "K" serials and not a Karan Johar's "k" movie a sad let down.